What is Hate Speech?

Since 1947, vote bank politics has been integral to Indian elections as political parties use various strategies to appeal to particular groups. Inflammatory speeches are a common aspect of election rallies. But, if India is a democracy and the freedom of expression is a fundamental right, is there even space for a concept like hate speech to exist?

In a 2014 ruling, the Supreme Court of India provided the following definition of hate speech:

“Hate speech is an effort to marginalise individuals based on their membership in a group. Using expression that exposes the group to hatred, hate speech seeks to delegitimise group members in the eyes of the majority, reducing their social standing and acceptance within society.”

The right to freedom of speech and expression is meant to safeguard democracy. Hate speech, on the other hand, erodes the democratic values of a nation by attempting to alienate its minorities. It is more than spewing vitriol at a particular community. It is essentially challenging their right to a dignified existence.

Unfortunately, the Indian penal code does not provide a concrete provision for persecuting a case of hate speech. Section 153A penalises actions that disrupt harmony and promote enmity between different groups. Section 153B punishes words or actions that cause hatred towards a community or imply that they should be deprived of their rights as Indian citizens.

Law enforcement has to use a mix of these provisions and others to maintain social harmony. However, it is difficult to prosecute a crime that barely has a definition. What’s more, persecution on the grounds mentioned above can be combated by evoking an individual’s right to freedom of expression.

Hate speech is not a new phenomenon in India. In fact, India is a hotbed for hate speech. Hindustan Times even compiled a video with the top 4 “nasty remarks” made during the 2014 election season. Things have only gotten worse since 2014. A primary reason for this is the political polarisation strategy used by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Under the BJP, Muslims have become the primary target of hate.

The rise of social media has increased the speed with which hate speech spreads. Platforms like Facebook, X [Twitter], and WhatsApp have made it possible for a speech made in Bihar to reach all the way to Karnataka in a few seconds. They have also made it possible for things that were not even said to make headlines in a matter of hours. Social media is a loosely regulated platform. Hate speech is a loosely monitored offence. When combined, the two make a stunning cocktail of unaccountability.

The twenty-first century opened with the “unity in diversity” ideal of India intact. Despite the excesses of the partition, the 1984 Sikh genocide, and the demolition of the Babri Masjid, politicians had stuck to the plurality narrative. Under the leadership of Narendra Modi, the Bharatiya Janata Party has demoted Muslims to second-class citizens.

Hate speech against Muslims has played a huge role in the shifting attitudes of the majority. India has one of the largest Muslim populations in the world. Muslims are also India’s largest minority group. Hence, villainising a group as large as this is likely going to affect India’s democratic nature.

 [Contributed by MC]

Back to Home Page

Frontier
Vol 57, No. 14, Sep 29 - Oct 5, 2024